Criminal Justice System :: essays research papers

I do feel that they will be effecitve and in the next few pages I will explain wherefore I feel this way and why I have interpreted this stand. First of wholly I read through the whole ask and as boring as it was I made it through unscaved. only if give care anything in order to have something you need a purpose. A reason for doing something. The reason why this undertake was brought forward was because that they realized that during that degree centigrade millions of children, mean and women have been victims of unimaginable atrocities that deeply shock the conscience of humanity. That sounds like enough for me. When I read that, I was think Oh my God, I mean come on unimaginable atrocities. It is obvious that something that to be through with(p) and even the littlest change would make a difference. The first thing they did was fix a Court. This lawcourt was permanent and had the power to exercise its legal power over people for the most serious crimes. What I like close ly this and a reason why I feel it will diddle also is that in the beginning of the charter is that they have a descent with the United Nations. This relationship only makes this court stronger. Part III of the charter looks a lot like a armed forces code of justice. It come outs principles to be followed by the court or in the military a Commander if you will. It appears to me that this charters strength is in Part III, because here is where all the rules or articles are that explain what can be done by the court and what can not be done. It breaks it down to the core, including what to do with soul under 18 years of age. I feel that this is where the strength of the court lies. It defines who is a criminal and who is not, it tells us when the court can pursue a criminal or when a crime is not comitted. The further I got into the parts, the more I strongly I feel about grammatical construction they will be effective. It seems as if this court is no different thusly another c ourt we have in the USA. Part four hardeneds up the membership. It states who is in charge of what and what their responsibilites should be. When you have people who tell apart what they are supposed to do and that they are held accountable to their jobs then visitation is not an option.