A Difficult Task Force: Organizational Behavior Essay

The concept of aggroups, teams and teamwork is a very important factor for good performance of the whole connection. I read the brass about the group of professionals who had to control and serve the new-made joint venture between companies from Japan, United States, and South America. This new community had to make, sell, and service pet caskets for the burial of beloved pets, mostly dogs and cats. During the first calendar month of work, each comp whatever had assigned personnel to the undertaking force. The members from every company were chosen to participate in the joint venture. As chair of the task force, Jose initiated a meeting of all the members of the new company. He gave historical information, and past he reviewed the market for the innovations of their prospective harvest-festival. The task force was to develop the initial number parameters for the new product to meet increasing demand roughly the world. Next part of the meeting was opened to comments and sug gestions.Mariana Preus, representative from Argentina, the head of product instauration, said that the current designs that they had in production in Argentina found were just fine, and he didnt see any reasons to innovate the design of their product. All other members of the meeting bookd non to make any changes in the design of the product. Jose reminded to all of the participants of the meeting that their task forces purpose is to redesign the product and its manufacturing systems. Finally, Jose had to agree with members of the meeting and to write a memo to the council of presidents with the recommendation to use existing designs and to begin immediately to design the plant and the manufacturing system. The meeting adjourned,d and Jose returned to his computer and started to write the memo that, he knew, would raise the presidents. He wondered what had he do wrong and what he could have done to prevent such result of the meeting.I think that in this case study we see an ex ample of the formal group that is formed by a manager to help the organization to accomplish its goals. The group ontogeny process wasnt finished and ended on the second putstorming. Analyzing the group member roles, in our situation Jose is the initiator of the meeting, information giver, notion seeker, and orienter. Mariana Preus has a role of initiator and information giver, because he insisted on the not redesigning of the product. The other members seem to serve just as a resistless audiencefollowers, because they all agreedto the Marianas suggestion, and didnt give any other opinions. Also, there was no group cohesiveness a we emotional state binding group members together to accomplish their goal.The diverse nature of the group affected the committees action by not fellow feeling and participating of all members in the meeting. If I was in Joses position, I would try to keep the group headed toward the stated goal better, and not to agree with the suggestion of one memb er, but to count the opinions of every member of the group. Also, it wasnt right to adjourn the meeting before getting the result that would shape up to the goal of the whole meeting.